4.5 Article

Modulator of the PI3K/Akt oncogenic pathway affects mTOR complex 2 in human adenocarcinoma cells

Journal

INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages 902-911

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10637-018-0705-7

Keywords

Akt; mTORC2; Adenocarcinoma; Chaetoglobosin K; Torin1

Funding

  1. Mercer University College of Pharmacy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chaetoglobosin K (ChK) is a natural product that has been shown to promote F-actin capping, inhibit growth, arrest cell cycle G2 phase, and induce apoptosis. ChK also has been shown to downregulate two important kinases involved in oncogenic pathways, Akt and JNK. This report investigates how ChK is involved in the receptor tyrosine kinase pathway (RTK/PI3K/mTORC2/Akt) to the centrally located protein kinase, Akt. Studies have reported that ChK does not inhibit PI3K comparable to wortmannin and does not affect PDK1 activation. PDK1 is responsible for phosphorylation on Akt T308, while mTORC2 phosphorylates Akt S473. Yet, Akt's two activation sites, T308 and S473, are known to be affected by ChK treatment. It was our hypothesis that ChK acts on the mTORC2 complex to inhibit the phosphorylation seen at Akt S473. This inhibition at mTORC2 should decrease phosphorylation at both these proteins, Akt and mTORC2 complex, compared to a known mTOR specific inhibitor, Torin1. Human lung adenocarcinoma H1299 and H2009 cells were treated with IGF-1 or calyculin A to increase phosphorylation at complex mTORC2 and Akt. Pretreatment with ChK was able to significantly decrease phosphorylation at Akt S473 similarly to Torin1 with either IGF-1 or calyculin A treatment. Moreover, the autophosphorylation site on complex mTORC2, S2481, was also significantly reduced with ChK pretreatment, similar to Torin1. This is the first report to illustrate that ChK has a significant effect at mTORC2 S2481 and Akt S473 comparable to Torin1, indicating that it may be a mTOR inhibitor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available