Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Predictors of Outcome After Primary Total Joint Replacement
Markus Weber et al.
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY (2018)
In-vivo 3-Dimensional gait symmetry analysis in patients with bilateral total hip arthroplasty
Paul Arauz et al.
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS (2018)
Navigation is Equal to Estimation by Eye and Palpation in Preventing Psoas Impingement in THA
Markus Weber et al.
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH (2017)
Accuracy of measuring acetabular cup position after total hip arthroplasty: comparison between a radiographic planning software and three-dimensional computed tomography
Vahdettin Bayraktar et al.
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS (2017)
Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips
Xavier Flecher et al.
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS (2017)
Trainee Surgeons Affect Operative Time but not Outcome in Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty
Markus Weber et al.
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2017)
Visual intraoperative estimation of cup and stem position is not reliable in minimally invasive hip arthroplasty
Michael Woerner et al.
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA (2016)
CURRENT CONSTRUCT OPTIONS FOR REVISION OF LARGE ACETABULAR DEFECTS A Systematic Review
Marieke Baauw et al.
JBJS REVIEWS (2016)
The impact of standard combined anteversion definitions on gait and clinical outcome within one year after total hip arthroplasty
Markus Weber et al.
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS (2015)
The use of customized cages in revision total hip arthroplasty for Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects
Yuanqing Mao et al.
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS (2015)
The accuracy of positioning of a custom-made implant within a large acetabular defect at revision arthroplasty of the hip
M. Baauw et al.
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL (2015)
Validity and Reliability of the Paprosky Acetabular Defect Classification
Raymond Yu et al.
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH (2013)
Acetabular cup positioning in revision total hip arthroplasty with Paprosky type III acetabular defects: Martell radiographic analysis
Ho-Rim Choi et al.
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS (2013)
Accuracy of Acetabular Component Position in Hip Arthroplasty
Robert L. Barrack et al.
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME (2013)
Functional acetabular component position with supine total hip replacement
W. Eilander et al.
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL (2013)
The position and orientation of total knee replacement components A COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL RADIOGRAPHS, TRANSVERSE 2D-CT SLICES AND 3D-CT RECONSTRUCTION
M. T. Hirschmann et al.
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME (2011)
The operation of the century: total hip replacement
Ian D. Learmonth et al.
LANCET (2007)
Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030
Steven Kurtz et al.
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME (2007)
Economic burden of revision hip and knee arthroplasty in Medicare enrollees
K. L. Ong et al.
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH (2006)
Position of the acetabular cup - accuracy of radiographic calculation compared to CT-based measurement
T Kalteis et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2006)
How reliable are reliability studies of fracture classifications?: A systematic review of their methodologies
L Audigé et al.
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA (2004)
Share Paper
