4.5 Article

Validating the use of census data on education as a measure of socioeconomic status in an occupational cohort

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages 587-592

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2018.1549758

Keywords

Epidemiology; database; lung neoplasms; modeling

Funding

  1. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission [NRC-HQ-60-14-G-0011]
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [5UE1EH000989, 5NUE1EH001315]
  3. National Aeronautics and Space Administration [DE-AU0000042, DE-AU0000046, N00024-17-C-4322, NNX15AU88G, 80NSSC17M0016]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0008944]
  5. Naval Sea Systems Command [N00024-17-C-4322]
  6. Oak Ridge National Laboratory from the Office of Radiation and Indoor Air, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, under Interagency Agreement DOE [1824 S581-A1, DE-AC05-00OR22725]
  7. UT-Battelle
  8. Oak Ridge Associated Universities from the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0014664]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In occupational epidemiology studies, adjusting for smoking status or using a reliable surrogate such as socioeconomic status (SES) is crucial. However, sometimes data on smoking patterns or individual-level SES are not available in occupational cohorts. To address this issue, this study demonstrated a method to obtain and geocode residential address histories and linked them to area-level SES measures. The results showed that area-level SES measures can serve as a reliable surrogate when individual-level indicators are not available for statistical adjustment, especially in outcomes affected by lifestyle factors like smoking.
Purpose Adjusting for smoking status or a reliable surrogate [such as socioeconomic status (SES)] is critically important in occupational epidemiology studies when any smoking-related cancer or cardiovascular disease is an outcome of interest. Sometimes, however, data on smoking patterns or individual-level smoking surrogates such as job title, education, pay scale or other measures of SES are not readily available in occupational cohorts. Methods and materials To obtain a surrogate measure for missing smoking or individual-level SES data, we demonstrate a method used to obtain and geocode residential address histories which were then linked to area-level SES measures from the United States Census in three test samples and then in a full cohort of workers from the Mound nuclear weapons facility in Dayton, Ohio, USA. The mean educational attainment of the Census Block Group was used to derive a categorical estimate of educational attainment which was compared to self-reported (SR) education available from Mound worker histories using Kappa statistics. Lung cancer mortality patterns between area-derived (AD) and SR education were investigated using Standardized Mortality Ratios (SMR) and Cox Proportional Hazards models with stratification or adjustment by either SR or AD education. Results Home address histories were obtained from linkages of individual worker data to online resources. In the test cohorts, mean educational attainment was the Census Block Group measure found to have the largest magnitude association with individual-level SES measures. Among 7251 Mound workers, 5685 (78.4%) had at least one residential address match (mean 4.9 addresses) identified. The SR and AD educational attainment measures were highly correlated (weighted Kappa coefficient 0.10, p < .0001). SMR patterns by SR and AD educational attainment were similar, with steadily decreasing mortality with increased educational attainment by either measure. Cox models for lung cancer using AD education produced similar results as those using SR education as an adjustment factor. Conclusion When individual-level SES indicators are not available for statistical adjustment, area-level SES measures can serve as a reliable surrogate when investigating outcomes that are affected by lifestyle factors such as smoking.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available