4.7 Article

Biohydrogen by Rhodobacter sphaeroides during photo-fermentation: Mixed vs. sole carbon sources enhance bacterial growth and H2 production

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 674-679

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.11.082

Keywords

Biohydrogen; Carbon sources; Photo-fermentation; ATPase activity; Rhodobacter sphaeroides

Funding

  1. Committee of Science, Ministry of Education and Science of Armenia [15T-1F123, 18T-1F045]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mixed carbon sources fermentation by bacteria is a promising approach for biohydrogen (H-2) production biotechnology. In the present study, growth and H-2 production by purple bacteria Rhodobacter sphaeroides MDC6521 during mixed carbon sources (succinate + acetate, succinate + malate, and malate + acetate) photo-fermentation was investigated. The growth rate of bacteria in mixed carbon sources containing medium was of similar to 0.33 h(-1) which was considerably higher (1.3-1.7-fold) compared with sole carbon substrate containing one. Moreover, the H-2 production during photo-fermentation of succinate and acetate mixture was of similar to 6.5 mmol H(2)g(-1) (dry weight of biomass) and significantly more (similar to 2-3-fold) than that with appropriate sole sources and higher (1.5-fold) than that with succinate and malate mixture. Probably, supplementation of the mixed carbon sources into bacterial culture alters the mode of metabolism, resulting in enhanced H-2 production, thus they can be preferable compared to the sole carbon source. The changed FOF1-ATPase activity of membrane vesicles suggested its important role in the increase of H-2 production efficiency. The results showed that mixed carbon sources provide more H-2 than the sole carbon substrates and succinate with acetate mixture is better than succinate with malate. (C) 2018 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available