4.7 Review

Salt domes in Poland - Potential sites for hydrogen storage in caverns

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 43, Issue 46, Pages 21414-21427

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.09.212

Keywords

Energy storage; Hydrogen underground storage; Salt domes; Energetic safety; Poland

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Poland as a statutory work of Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute Polish Academy of Science [4448/E-275/S/2018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Salt bearing formations have world-wide distribution. The geological structures of Permian salt bearing deposits in Poland are similar to those in the other parts of the Central European salt basin, to which they belong as its SE part. There is a notable trend to use salt domes as sites for underground storage of various gases, fuels and other substances, including hydrogen. Possibilities of using salt domes in Poland for underground hydrogen storage are presented with the focus on the option of using the underground space for energy storage. Usefulness of the 27 hitherto studied salt domes in the Polish Lowlands for underground hydrogen storage in caverns is evaluated using analytical methods of the geology of mineral deposits. Seven not yet developed salt domes are selected as the most promising ones, taking into account geological and reservoir criteria: Rogoino, Damaslawek, Lubien, Lanita, Goleniow, Izbica Kujawska and Debina. Initial experience in underground hydrogen storage in salt caverns is presented. Geological conditions favourable for hydrogen storage in underground caverns leached in salt domes are outlined. Their advantage relative to underground storage sites in porous rocks (depleted hydrocarbon deposits and deep aquifers) is discussed. (C) 2018 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available