4.5 Article

Ignition advancement study for optimized characteristics of a raw biogas operated spark ignition engine

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREEN ENERGY
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 101-113

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15435075.2018.1544901

Keywords

Raw biogas; spark ignition engine; ignition advance; maximum brake torque timing; performance analysis; combustion analysis

Funding

  1. Defence Research and Development Organization (DRDO), New Delhi (India) [ERIP/ER/1200434/01/1524]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the current investigation, raw biogas obtained from rural sectors was used as the alternative to gasoline fuel in the spark ignition (SI) engine. The performance and efficiency are mainly dependent on the combustion phasing for which ignition timing is an effective tool in a SI engine. Hence, the objective of the present work is to understand the effect of variable ignition timing for a biogas-fueled SI engine. For this purpose, a single cylinder, 4-stroke, SI engine of rated power 4.5kW was operated with raw biogas at a compression ratio (CR) of 10. By maintaining a speed of 1650 rpm, the engine was operated in wide open (WOT) and part throttle (PT) mode with an equivalence ratio of 0.81 and 0.83, respectively. It was observed that the biogas fueled SI engine was found to be operative only within the ignition advance (IA) range of 33-47 degrees CA bTDC both in WOT and PT conditions. The results showed optimal brake power (BP), brake thermal efficiency (BTE) and brake specific fuel consumption (BSFC) are achieved at 45 degrees CA bTDC. The average peak cylinder pressure, neat heat release rate (NHRR) and mean gas temperature (MGT) are also observed to be maximum while CO and HC emission at this point of IA were found to be minimum. Due to controlled and complete combustion, CO2 and NOx concentration in the exhaust emission were found to be higher at this point of ignition timing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available