4.4 Article

Effect of the Particle Size of 316L Stainless Steel on the Corrosion Characteristics of the Steel Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTROCHEMICAL SCIENCE
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages 10217-10232

Publisher

ESG
DOI: 10.20964/2018.11.11

Keywords

selective laser melting; stainless steel; corrosion characteristics; anodic polarization; immersion testing

Funding

  1. Research and Development Program of Sichuan Province [15ZC0370]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The corrosion characteristics of 316L stainless steel (SS316L) fabricated by selective laser melting (SLM) in a 6.0 wt.% FeCl3 solution was investigated in this study. To analyse the relationship between the corrosion factor and powder feedstock, three samples were made by SLM with three particle sizes, and their potentiodynamic polarization curve were measured using a CHI660E electrochemical working station in a 6.0 wt.% FeCl3 solution at 25 degrees C. The microstructure was investigated by optical microscopy (OM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Corrosion products analyses were performed using an X-ray energy dispersion spectroscopy (EDS) detection system. The results showed that the SLM samples prepared with fine powder possessed the best surface quality with a much lower porosity and without un-melted powder particles. Compared with the SLM samples from the coarse powder and raw powder, the SLM samples from fine powder exhibited a higher corrosion potential (E-corr) by 18.94 %, 28.09 % and 67.33 % at the XY-plane, the XZ-plane and the YZ-plane, respectively. However, the corrosion current density (i(corr)) at the three cross-sections of the SLM, sample from fine powder was not lower than that of the other two samples. The weight loss of the SLM sample from fine powder was the highest. These results indicated that the corrosion tendency of the SLM sample from the fine powder was the lowest, but its corrosion rate was the fastest.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available