4.6 Article

Heart rate reduction strategy using ivabradine in end-stage Duchenne cardiomyopathy

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Volume 280, Issue -, Pages 99-103

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.01.052

Keywords

Duchenne cardiomyopathy; Ivabradine; Heart rate reduction; End-stage heart failure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: End-stage dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD). No studies are available on the effect of ivabradine on long-term outcomes in end-stage DMD/DCM. Methods: We prospectively enrolled a cohort of end-stage DMD/DCM patients with LV ejection fraction <40%, on chronic HF treatment with an ACE inhibitor referred consecutively from 2012 to 2017 to Bambino Gesu Children's Hospital. In each patient, before starting HRR strategy and after 1 year, we collected medical records comprehensive of clinical, demographic and imaging parameters, BNP levels, neurological and respiratory assessment. Results: Twenty male patients with DMD/DCM with a mean age of 15.0 +/- 3.5 (13-19 IQR) years were enrolled and divided into 2 groups according to ivabradine therapy. This group showed a higher incidence of MACEs compared to others in treatment with ivabradine (87.5% vs 12.5%, p = 0.025). At Kaplan Meier survival analysis curves, the rate free from MACEs was higher in patients treated with ivabradine (log rank p = 0.017). At multivariate Cox regression analysis, ivabradine therapy was an independent predictor of freedom from MACEs (H.R. 0.078, 95% CI 0.007-0.877, p = 0.039). Conclusion: HRR strategy, whether achieved by beta blockers alone or in combination with ivabradine, seemed to be effective in reducing the incidence of acute adverse events, reaching optimal target heart rate and improving left ventricular function in DMD/DCM patients. (c) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available