4.7 Article

Increased expression of long non-coding RNA SNHG16 correlates with tumor progression and poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES
Volume 121, Issue -, Pages 270-278

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.004

Keywords

Non-small cell lung cancer; Long non-coding RNA SNHG16; miR-146a; MUC5AC; Proliferation; Migration; Invasion

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81400024]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we report that lncRNA SNHG16 is upregulated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tissues, and correlates with tumor size, TNM stage and lymph node metastasis. Kaplan-Meier analysis shows that the patients with high SNHG16 expression have poorer disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) than the patients with low SNHG16 expression. Multivariate Cox regression analysis reveals that SNHG16 expression could be regarded as an independent predictor for DFS and OS in NSCLC patients. Cell experiments show that SNHG16 promotes NSCLC cell proliferation, migration and invasion. miR-146a is further identified and confirmed to be the target of SNHG16, and SNHG16 functions by targeting miR-146a. Subsequently, MUC5AC, a major mucin in the human respiratory tract correlated with post-operative metastasis and recurrence of NSCLC, is confirmed to be regulated by SNHG16 and miR-146a, and plays a positive role in promoting cell proliferation, migration and invasion, which might be involved in the oncogenic activity of SNHG16-miR-146a axis in NSCLC. Animal experiments also confirm these conclusions. Collectively, these results elucidate a potential mechanism underlying the carcinogenesis role of SNHG16 in NSCLC, and indicate that SNHG16 could act as a novel promising marker for prognosis, and a potential therapeutic target for NSCLC treatment. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available