4.6 Article

Evaluation of surface integrity after high energy machining with EDM, laser beam machining and abrasive water jet machining of alloy 718

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-018-2697-z

Keywords

Non-conventional machining; EDM; Laser beam machining; Abrasive water jet machining; Surface integrity; Residual stress; EBSD; Topography

Funding

  1. VINNOVA, the Swedish Government agency within the Ministry of Enterprise [2013-04666, 2015-06047]
  2. Vinnova [2015-06047, 2013-04666] Funding Source: Vinnova

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Development of future aero engine components based on new design strategies utilising topological optimisation and additive manufacturing has in the past years become a reality. This allows for designs that involve geometries of free form surfaces and material combinations that could be difficult to machine using conventional milling. Hence, alternative manufacturing routes using non-conventional high energy methods are interesting to explore. In this investigation, the three high energy machining methods abrasive water jet machining (AWJM), electrical discharge machining (EDM) and laser beam machining (LBM) have been compared in terms of surface integrity to the reference, a ball nosed end milled surface. The results showed great influence on the surface integrity from the different machining methods. It was concluded that AWJM resulted in the highest quality regarding surface integrity properties with compressive residual stresses in the surface region and a low surface roughness with texture from the abrasive erosion. Further, it was shown that EDM resulted in shallow tensile residual stresses in the surface and an isotropic surface texture with higher surface roughness. However, even though both methods could be considered as possible alternatives to conventional milling they require post processing. The reason is that the surfaces need to be cleaned from either abrasive medium from AWJM or recast layer from EDM. It was further concluded that LBM should not be considered as an alternative in this case due to the deep detrimental impact from the machining process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available