4.7 Article

Evolutionary mining of skyline clusters of attributed graph data

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 509, Issue -, Pages 501-514

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2018.09.053

Keywords

Graph clustering; Attributed graphs; Skyline; Evolutionary algorithms; Multi-objective optimization

Funding

  1. INSERM-ITMO Cancer SysBio program (LIONS project) [BIO2015-04]
  2. FP7 ERA-Net Chist-Era program (AdaLab project) [ANR 14-CHR2-0001-01]
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-14-CHR2-0001] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Graph clustering is one of the most important research topics in graph mining and network analysis. Given the abundance of data in many real-world applications, graph nodes and edges could be annotated with multiple sets of attributes that could be derived from heterogeneous data sources. The consideration of these attributes during graph clustering would facilitate the generation of graph clusters with balanced and cohesive intra-cluster structures and nodes with homogeneous properties. In this paper, we propose a graph clustering approach for mining skyline clusters over large attributed graphs based on the dominance relationship. Each skyline solution is optimized simultaneously for multiple fitness functions, each function is defined over the graph topology or over a particular set of attributes derived from multiple data sources. We evaluate our approach experimentally with a large protein-protein interaction network of the human interactome enriched with large sets of heterogeneous cancer-associated attributes. The results demonstrate the efficiency of our approach and show how integrating node attributes from multiple data sources can result in a more robust graph clustering than the consideration of the graph topology alone. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available