4.7 Article

Multi-granularity three-way decisions with adjustable hesitant fuzzy linguistic multigranulation decision-theoretic rough sets over two universes

Journal

INFORMATION SCIENCES
Volume 507, Issue -, Pages 665-683

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.01.033

Keywords

Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets; Multi-granularity three-way decisions; Decision-theoretic rough sets; Multigranulation; Group decision making

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61806116, 61672331, 61603278, 61432011, 61573231, U1435212]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi Province [201801D221175, 2015091001-0102]
  3. Scientific and Technological Innovation Programs of Higher Education Institutions in Shanxi (STIP) [201802014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The notion of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (HFLTSs), which enables experts to utilize a few possible linguistic terms to evaluate varieties of common qualitative information, plays a significant role in handling situations in cases where these experts are hesitant in offering linguistic expressions. For addressing the challenges of information analysis and information fusion in hesitant fuzzy linguistic (HFL) group decision making, in accordance with the multi-granularity three-way decisions paradigm, the primary purpose of this study is to develop the notion of multigranulation decision-theoretic rough sets (MG-DTRSs) into the HFL background within the two-universe framework. Having revisited the relevant literature, we first propose a hybrid model named adjustable HFL MG-DTRSs over two universes by introducing an adjustable parameter for the expected risk appetite of experts, in which both optimistic and pessimistic versions of HFL MG-DTRSs over two universes are special cases of the adjustable version. Second, some of the fundamental properties of the proposed model are discussed. Then, on the basis of the presented hybrid model, a group decision making approach within the HFL context is further constructed. Finally, a practical example, a comparative analysis, and a validity test concerning person job fit problems are explored to reveal the rationality and practicability of the constructed decision making rule. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available