4.7 Article

Biorefining of Cymbopogon nardus from Reunion Island into essential oil and antioxidant fractions by conventional and high pressure extraction methods

Journal

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
Volume 126, Issue -, Pages 158-167

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.10.015

Keywords

Cymbopogon nardu; Sessential oil; Antioxidant capacity; Antibacterial capacity; Supercritical fluid extraction; Pressurized liquid extraction

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Steam distilled essential oil of Cymbopogon nardus has been widely studied and commercialized; however, comprehensive valorisation of plant material requires more systematic characterization of other, non-volatile extracts and their potential activities. For this purpose C. nardus herb was fractionated into essential oil (EO) and non-volatile fractions by hydrodistillation (HD), Soxhlet (S), supercritical CO2 (SFE-CO2) and pressurized liquid (PLE) extractions. Antioxidant potential was evaluated by total phenolics (TPC), DPPH center dot/ABTS(center dot+) scavenging and oxygen radical absorbance (ORAC) capacity. The yields were from 1.37/1.39% for SFE-CO2 (50 degrees C)/HD to 12.2/12.6% (w/w) for PLE-water/freeze dried after EO-HD water (PLE-WE/FD-WE). TPC was higher in S-acetone (S-AE) and PLE-WE, 70 and 60 mg of gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/g dew (dry extract weight), respectively. S-AE and S-ethanol extracts were strongest antioxidants, on average equivalent to 770 mu mol of trolox equivalents (TE)/g dew in ABTS assay. Antibacterial activity was tested by well agar diffusion and minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) methods with various microorganisms; EO at 3% inhibited all bacteria, except for S. aureus and S. typhimurium; MICs were in the range of 0.39-12.5 mg/mL. C. nardus extracts may be considered as potential natural antioxidants and antibacterial agents and a good source of phenolics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available