4.5 Article

In vitro functional characterization of the novel DHH mutations p.(Asn337Lysfs*24) and p.(Glu212Lys) associated with gonadal dysgenesis

Journal

HUMAN MUTATION
Volume 39, Issue 12, Pages 2097-2109

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/humu.23664

Keywords

46,XY DSD; auto-processing; Desert hedgehog; gonadal dysgenesis; polyneuropathy

Funding

  1. BMBF [01DQ17004]
  2. Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research
  3. University of Luebeck
  4. University of Lubeck 'Medizinische Genetik'

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In humans, mutations of Desert Hedgehog gene (DHH) have been described in patients with 46,XY gonadal dysgenesis (GD), associated or not with polyneuropathy. In this study, we describe two patients diagnosed with GD, both harboring novel DHH compound heterozygous mutations p.[Tyr176*];[Asn337Lysfs*24] and p.[Tyr176*];[Glu212Lys]. To investigate the functional consequences of p.(Asn337Lysfs*24) and p.(Glu212Lys) mutations, located within the C-terminal part of DHh on auto-processing, we performed in vitro cleavage assays of these proteins in comparison with Drosophila melanogaster Hedgehog (Hh). We found that p.(Glu212Lys) mutation retained 50% of its activity and led to a partially abolished DHh auto-processing. In contrast, p.(Asn337Lysfs*24) mutation resulted in a complete absence of auto-proteolysis. Furthermore, we found a different auto-processing profile between Drosophila Hh and human DHh, which suggests differences in the processing mechanism between the two species. Review of the literature shows that proven polyneuropathy and GD is associated with complete disruption of DHh-N, whereas disruption of the DHh auto-processing is only described with GD. We propose a model that may explain the differences between Schwann and Leydig cell development by autocrine versus paracrine DHh signaling. To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the effect of DHH mutations on DHh in vitro auto-processing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available