4.7 Article

Quantitative neuroimaging measures of myelin in the healthy brain and in multiple sclerosis

Journal

HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING
Volume 40, Issue 7, Pages 2104-2116

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24510

Keywords

individual differences; magnetization transfer ratio; multiple sclerosis; myelin; myelin water imaging; quantitative MRI; relaxometry

Funding

  1. Royal Society [206675/Z/17/Z]
  2. Wellcome Trust/EPSRC Centre for Medical Engineering [WT 203148/Z/16/Z]
  3. F. Hoffman-La Roche AG
  4. Genentech
  5. F. Hoffmann La Roche
  6. Sanofi Genzyme
  7. Milan & Maureen Ilich Foundation
  8. Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research
  9. Chugai
  10. Roche
  11. Novartis
  12. Genzyme
  13. Biogen
  14. General Electric (GE) Healthcare
  15. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  16. King's College London
  17. Canada Research Chairs
  18. Canadian Institute of Health Research
  19. Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada
  20. Academy of Health Care Learning
  21. Biogen-Idec
  22. Consortium of MS Centers
  23. Sanofi-Genzyme
  24. Teva
  25. Merck-Serono
  26. Wellcome Trust
  27. MRC [MR/N026063/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques have been developed as imaging biomarkers, aiming to improve the specificity of MRI to underlying pathology compared to conventional weighted MRI. For assessing the integrity of white matter (WM), myelin, in particular, several techniques have been proposed and investigated individually. However, comparisons between these methods are lacking. In this study, we compared four established myelin-sensitive MRI techniques in 56 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) and 38 healthy controls. We used T2-relaxation with combined GRadient And Spin Echoes (GRASE) to measure myelin water fraction (MWF-G), multi-component driven equilibrium single pulse observation of T-1 and T-2 (mcDESPOT) to measure MWF-D, magnetization-transfer imaging to measure magnetization-transfer ratio (MTR), and T-1 relaxation to measure quantitative T-1 (qT(1)). Using voxelwise Spearman correlations, we tested the correspondence of methods throughout the brain. All four methods showed associations that varied across tissue types; the highest correlations were found between MWF-D and qT(1) (median rho across tissue classes 0.8) and MWF-G and MWF-D (median rho = 0.59). In eight WM tracts, all measures showed differences (p < 0.05) between MS normal-appearing WM and healthy control WM, with qT1 showing the highest number of different regions (8), followed by MWF-D and MTR (6), and MWF-G (n = 4). Comparing the methods in terms of their statistical sensitivity to MS lesions in WM, MWF-D demonstrated the best accuracy (p < 0.05, after multiple comparison correction). To aid future power analysis, we provide the average and standard deviation volumes of the four techniques, estimated from the healthy control sample.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available