4.7 Article

The origins and maintenance of global species endemism

Journal

GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages 170-183

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/geb.12834

Keywords

amphibians; climate seasonality; climate stability; climate velocity; endemic species; endemism; macroecology; mammals; spatial heterogeneity; species richness

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. University of Ottawa Research Chair in Macroecology and Conservation
  3. NSERC
  4. University of Ottawa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim We test macroecological hypotheses (H1: long-term climate stability; H2: climate seasonality; H3: climate distinctiveness or rarity; and, H4: spatial heterogeneity in contemporary climate, topography or habitat) proposed to explain broad-scale patterns of total species endemism. Location Continental areas worldwide and zoogeographical realms. Methods Using species distribution maps for mammals and amphibians, we calculated five metrics of species endemism, based on inverse and median range size, and range size cut-offs. We performed multi-model averaging. We tested the accuracy of fitted models using cross-validation, comparing observed versus predicted values of endemism among zoogeographical realms. Results Model averaging showed that species endemism for amphibians and mammals was statistically related to all set of predictors (H1, H2, H4 and richness), except for climate distinctiveness (H3). Effect sizes for spatial heterogeneity were larger and more consistent among zoogeographical realms than the effect sizes of climate stability. The effect of species richness on species endemism varies widely and depends on the metric of endemism and taxonomic group used in the analysis. Cross-validation across all zoogeographical realms showed that predictions of endemism systematically fail for both taxa. In most cases, low to moderate endemism is predicted reasonably well. However, areas with high numbers of endemic species are systematically under-predicted. Main conclusions Our results are not consistent with any of the processes hypothesized to create and maintain global patterns of endemism. Although we found statistically significant relationships, they failed the stronger test of a causal relationship: accurate prediction in independent data. The inconsistent effect of richness in our models suggests that patterns of endemism are not driven by the same variables as total richness. Patterns of endemism have no consistent relationships with climatic stability among zoogeographical realms, so suggestions that endemism reflect climatic stability are likely due to collinearity with other factors, especially spatial heterogeneity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available