4.8 Article

Managing the middle: A shift in conservation priorities based on the global human modification gradient

Journal

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 811-826

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14549

Keywords

Bonn challenge; connectivity; conservation planning; cumulative impact assessment; ecological integrity; habitat restoration; Half-Earth; human footprint; intermediate disturbance; land use policy; landscape fragmentation threshold; landscape gradient; protected areas; Sustainable Development Goals; wilderness

Funding

  1. The Nature Conservancy
  2. Anne Ray Charitable Trust
  3. 3M Foundation
  4. NASA Land Cover Land Use Change Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An increasing number of international initiatives aim to reconcile development with conservation. Crucial to successful implementation of these initiatives is a comprehensive understanding of the current ecological condition of landscapes and their spatial distributions. Here, we provide a cumulative measure of human modification of terrestrial lands based on modeling the physical extents of 13 anthropogenic stressors and their estimated impacts using spatially explicit global datasets with a median year of 2016. We quantified the degree of land modification and the amount and spatial configuration of low modified lands (i.e., natural areas relatively free from human alteration) across all ecoregions and biomes. We identified that fewer unmodified lands remain than previously reported and that most of the world is in a state of intermediate modification, with 52% of ecoregions classified as moderately modified. Given that these moderately modified ecoregions fall within critical land use thresholds, we propose that they warrant elevated attention and require proactive spatial planning to maintain biodiversity and ecosystem function before important environmental values are lost.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available