4.4 Review

Role of quorum sensing in bacterial infections

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CASES
Volume 3, Issue 7, Pages 575-598

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i7.575

Keywords

Quorum sensing; Virulence; Infections; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Staphylococcus aureus; Animal models

Funding

  1. JSPS [25660062]
  2. SEP-CONACyT [152794]
  3. Fideicomiso COLPOS [167304]
  4. Programa Catedras-CONACyT [2112]
  5. Miguel Servet Program (C.H.U.A Coruna)
  6. Miguel Servet Program (ISCIII)
  7. CONACyT [441393/269132]
  8. Biotechnology Endowed Chair at the Pennsylvania State University
  9. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25660062] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quorum sensing (QS) is cell communication that is widely used by bacterial pathogens to coordinate the expression of several collective traits, including the production of multiple virulence factors, biofilm formation, and swarming motility once a population threshold is reached. Several lines of evidence indicate that QS enhances virulence of bacterial pathogens in animal models as well as in human infections; however, its relative importance for bacterial pathogenesis is still incomplete. In this review, we discuss the present evidence from in vitro and in vivo experiments in animal models, as well as from clinical studies, that link QS systems with human infections. We focus on two major QS bacterial models, the opportunistic Gram negative bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa and the Gram positive Staphylococcus aureus, which are also two of the main agents responsible of nosocomial and wound infections. In addition, QS communication systems in other bacterial, eukaryotic pathogens, and even immune and cancer cells are also reviewed, and finally, the new approaches proposed to combat bacterial infections by the attenuation of their QS communication systems and virulence are also discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available