4.5 Article

Experimental investigations of the heat load effect on heat transfer of ground heat exchangers in a layered subsurface

Journal

GEOTHERMICS
Volume 77, Issue -, Pages 75-82

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2018.08.011

Keywords

Ground source heat pump system; Ground heat exchanger; Laboratory investigation; Ground stratification; Heat load

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51576023, 91643102]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [106112016CDJCR211221]
  3. 111 Project [B13041]
  4. China Scholarship Council [201506050034]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To experimentally investigate the effect of heat loads on the thermal performance of vertical ground heat exchangers (GHEs) in a layered subsurface, a series of experiments were conducted using a testing box filled with sand and clay. Temperature distributions during the operation and recovery periods were different in the layered subsurface, where materials with high thermal diffusivities (e.g. sand) excel in both heat transfer and recovery. With more heat transferred from tubes, the sand and clay located close to the tubes showed drastic temperature variations along the length of tubes, especially around the interface between layers. The thermal interference could enhance the layered thermal distribution in the stratified underground, especially in materials with low thermal diffusivities. Moreover, if the applied power increased by four times, the proportion of the temperature difference between sand and clay to the sand temperature increased from 12.9% to 32.7%, which indicated a more severe thermal stratification. Therefore, it is recommended to consider the effect of ground stratification for multi-GHEs with considerable thermal injection and severe thermal interference, especially in materials with low thermal diffusivities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available