4.6 Article

A discrete representation of material heterogeneity for the finite-difference modelling of seismic wave propagation in a poroelastic medium

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
Volume 216, Issue 2, Pages 1072-1099

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggy412

Keywords

Numerical approximations and analysis; Computational seismology; Theoretical seismology; Wave propagation

Funding

  1. Slovak Research and Development Agency [APVV-15-0560]
  2. Research and Development Operational Programme - ERDF [ITMS 26230120002, 26210120002]
  3. junior Comenius University in Bratislava Grant [UK3242017]
  4. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Maria Sklodowska-Curie grant [777778]
  5. Spanish National project [TIN2016-80957-P]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As recently demonstrated the most advanced finite-difference (FD) schemes are sufficiently efficient and accurate numerical-modelling tools for seismic wave propagation and earthquake ground motion especially in local surface sedimentary structures. The key advantages of the explicit FD schemes are a uniform grid, no matter what positions of material interfaces are in the grid, and one scheme for all interior points, no matter what their positions are with respect to the material interfaces. Efficiency and accuracy is determined by the grid dispersion and discrete representation of a material heterogeneity. After having developed discrete representations for the elastic and viscoelastic media, we present here a new discrete representation of material heterogeneity in the poroelastic medium. The representation is capable of subcell resolution and makes it possible to model an arbitrary shape and position of an interface in the grid. At the same time, the structure and thus the number of operations in the FD scheme are unchanged compared to the homogeneous or smoothly heterogeneous medium.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available