4.7 Article

Zinc isotope fractionation during the inorganic precipitation of calcite - Towards a new pH proxy

Journal

GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 244, Issue -, Pages 99-112

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2018.09.005

Keywords

Zn isotopes; Calcite; Aqueous speciation; Paleo-pH proxy

Funding

  1. CNRS
  2. Nawi Graz

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Zinc was co-precipitated with calcite in mixed-flow reactors at 25 degrees C and 6.1 <= pH <= 8.5 to quantify Zn isotope fractionation between calcite and the reactive fluid. The results suggest that the difference between the isotopic composition of the solid and the fluid (Delta Zn-66(calcite-fluid) = delta Zn-66(calcite) - delta Zn-66(fluid)) increases by about 0.6 parts per thousand as the solution pH decreases from 8.5 to 6.1. In contrast, based on Zn aqueous speciation and the theoretical values of the reduced partition function ratios for zinc species, ln beta, the isotopic fractionation between calcite and aqueous Zn2+, Delta Zn-66(calcite - Zn2+), remains constant at 0.58 +/- 0.05 parts per thousand over the entire pH range investigated. The constant value of Delta Zn-66(calcite - Zn2+) suggests that irrespective of the solution pH, the same Zn aqueous species, likely free Zn2+ ions, interacts with calcite surface sites during the growth of this mineral via ion by ion attachment. The enrichment of calcite in Zn-66 is consistent with the formation of mononuclear, inner-sphere tetrahedral Zn surface complexes at the calcite surface and the increase of Zn coordination to 6 following its incorporation in the crystal lattice with no further isotopic fractionation. Overall, the results suggest that Zn isotopic composition of natural calcite has the potential to shed light on the prevailing pH at the time of calcite formation in the geological past. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available