4.7 Article

Characterization of HPV integration, viral gene expression and E6E7 alternative transcripts by RNA-Seq: A descriptive study in invasive cervical cancer

Journal

GENOMICS
Volume 111, Issue 6, Pages 1853-1861

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2018.12.008

Keywords

HPV expression; HPV genome integration; E6E7 alternative transcripts; Alternative splicing; Cervical cancer

Funding

  1. National Institute for Cancer Control (INCT para Controle do Cancer)
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq, Brazil) [305873/2014-8, 573806/2008-0]
  3. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ, Brazil) [E26/170.026/2008]
  4. Ministry of Health, Brazil
  5. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES, Brazil)
  6. Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Scarce data are available on the expression of papillomavirus genome and the frequency of alternatively spliced E6E7 mRNAs in invasive cervical cancer. We carried out a comprehensive characterization of HPV expression by RNA-Seq analysis in 22 invasive cervical cancer with HPV16 or HPV18, characterizing the presence of integrated/episomal viral DNA, the integration sites in human genome and the proportion of alternative splicing products of E6 and E7 genes. The expression patterns suggested the presence of episomal and/or integrated viral DNA, with integration detected in most tumors, frequently occurring within human genes in HPV18+ and in intergenic regions in HPV16+ tumors. Alternative splicing of E6E7 transcripts showed E6*I as the most frequent isoform for both viral types, followed by E6*II and E6/E7 (unspliced) transcripts in HPV16+, and by E6/E7 in HPV18+ tumors. Previously described E6*VI and E6*V transcript isoforms for HPV16, and E6*X for HPV18, were rare or not detected.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available