4.7 Article

Direct and postsynthesis of tin-incorporated SBA-15 functionalized with sulfonic acid for efficient biodiesel production

Journal

FUEL
Volume 235, Issue -, Pages 426-432

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.08.029

Keywords

SBA-15; Sulfonic acid; Esterification; Biodiesel; Reusability

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [21306063]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JUSRP51623A, JUSRP51507]
  3. Key Research and Development Program of Jiangsu Province (Industry Outlook and Common Key Technologies) [BE2015204]
  4. MOE & SAFEA for the 111 Project [B13025]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two types of sulfonic acid functionalized tin-incorporated SBA-15 mesoporous molecular sieves catalysts were prepared by the post functionalization method and one-pot functionalization method, which were designated as p-Sn-SBA-15-SO3H and o-Sn-SBA-15-SO3H, respectively. The catalysts were characterized by X-ray diffraction, FT-IR, nitrogen adsorption-desorption, pyridine-FTIR, thermogravimetric analysis, scanning electronic microscope and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The results demonstrated that tin and sulfonic acid were introduced into the framework of SBA-15 successfully for both catalysts, the structure and morphology of p-SnSBA- 15-SO3H was superior to that of o-Sn-SBA-15-SO3H. However, the experimental results showed that o-Sn-SBA-15-SO3H revealed a higher catalytic activity (conversion of 97.9%) than p-Sn-SBA-15-SO3H (conversion of 93.2%), due to the higher acidity of o-Sn-SBA-15-SO3H. It can be inferred that the catalytic performance was relative to both the structure and acidity of the catalyst, but the latter was a main factor in the catalytic system. The o-Sn-SBA-15-SO3H catalyst could still retain over 85.0% of conversion after 6 reaction cycles, indicating its good reusability and possibility of industrial applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available