4.7 Article

Recyclable CuS sorbent with large mercury adsorption capacity in the presence of SO2 from non-ferrous metal smelting flue gas

Journal

FUEL
Volume 235, Issue -, Pages 847-854

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.08.062

Keywords

Elemental mercury; Non-ferrous metal smelting flue gas; Metal sulfide; SO3

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC0210500]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51478261, 21677096]
  3. National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talents [BX201700151]
  4. China's Post-doctoral Science Fun [2017M620156]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gaseous elemental mercury (Hg-0) is difficult to dispose using traditional sorbents when co-existed with high concentration of SO2 from non-ferrous smelting gas. CuS was selected for Hg-0 removal from non-ferrous metal smelting flue gas due to large Hg-0 uptake capacity under SO2 condition. Hg-0 removal experiments indicated that CuS has the largest Hg-0 adsorption capacity compared to that of ZnS, CdS, MnS and SnS. The Hg-0 adsorption rate and capacity of CuS at 50 degrees C was 0.0716 mg/(g.min) and 50.17 mg/g with 50% breakthrough threshold, respectively. In addition, the effects of reaction factors such as reaction temperatures and gas components (O-2, SO2, H2O, SO3) on Hg-0 removal performances were investigated. O-2, H2O and SO2 showed negligible influences on Hg-0 capture. However, SO3 competed with mercury for adsorption sites, resulting in a decrease of mercury adsorption capacity. The XPS analysis and Hg-TPD results indicated that the adsorbed mercury mainly existed as HgS on the material surface. CuS exhibited high mercury adsorption capacity under SO2 atmosphere at low temperature, appeared to be a promising material for Hg-0 capture from non-ferrous metal smelting flue gas. They can be used co-benefit with electrostatic demister (ESD), upstream entering the acid plant for SO2 recovery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available