4.7 Article

Occurrence of four pathogenic Vibrios in Chinese freshwater fish farms in 2016

Journal

FOOD CONTROL
Volume 95, Issue -, Pages 85-89

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.07.043

Keywords

Freshwater fish farms; Vibrio parahaemolyticus; Vibrio alginolyticus; Vibrio vulnificus; Vibrio cholerae; Contamination

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC1601503]
  2. national risk surveillance fund in China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this survey was to investigate the distribution of major pathogenic Vibrio spp. (Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio alginolyticus, Vibrio vulnificus and Vibiro cholerae) in Chinese freshwater fish farms. In total, 4064 samples of freshwater fish, water and sediment were collected from 12 provinces covering every quarter in 2016. The occurrence of Vibrios was as follows: V. cholerae (10.33%), V. parahaemolyticus (3.89%), V. alginolyticus (1.24%) and V. vulnificus (0.76%). Among 158 confirmed V. parahaemolyticus isolates, 44 isolates (27.85%) had virulence genes (trh/tdh). Among 420 confirmed V. cholerae isolates, 4 were the 01 stains and 4 were the 0139 strains. Out of 112 freshwater farms, 58.93% had Vibrios-positive samples. The rates of Vibrios-positive samples from May to October (12.45%-35.20%) were higher than those in other months (0.00%-8.07%). Compared the environment factors of Vibrios positive and negative water samples, there was a significantly difference in temperature (P < 0.01), while no significant difference in salinity and pH value (P > 0.05). In summary, the study presents comprehensive contamination data on the occurrence of four major pathogenic Vibrios in freshwater aquaculture of China for the first time, and the results indicate that Vibrios are widely distributed in aquaculture environment and a further risk assessment is needed to conduct.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available