4.4 Article

D-Optimal Design and PARAFAC as Useful Tools for the Optimisation of Signals from Fluorescence Spectroscopy Prior to the Characterisation of Green Tea Samples

Journal

FOOD ANALYTICAL METHODS
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 761-772

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12161-018-01408-0

Keywords

Green tea; Front-face fluorescence spectroscopy; D-optimal design; PARAFAC; PCA; Characterisation

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad/Agencia Estatal de Investigacion (AEI) [CTQ2014-53157-R, CTQ2017-88894-R]
  2. Junta de Castilla y Leon [BU012P17]
  3. European FEDER, EU funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A procedure based on a D-optimal design coupled with PARAFAC was proposed to optimise signals from molecular fluorescence spectroscopy to obtain the best experimental conditions for the achievement of the best fluorescence signal of green tea samples. Excitation-emission signals (EEMs) were used to analyse the liquid samples (tea infusions), whereas front-face fluorescence excitation-emission matrices (FFEEMs) were recorded for the solid samples (raw or powder tea leaves). The experimental effort was reduced considerably in both cases thanks to the D-optimal design. Once the optimal conditions have been found, the characterisation of green tea was carried out and the sensitivity and specificity were evaluated. The projection of the principal component analysis (PCA) scores enabled to differentiate among the types of liquid green tea (Chinese tea, Chinese tea with lemon and Indian tea with and without theine). The discrimination of solid green tea according to its geographical origin (Chinese, Indian and Japanese) was also carried out through PCA. In addition, the discrimination between the most expensive Japanese tea and the cheapest one was possible. The sensitivity of the models built with SIMCA was 100% and the specificity of the models for the Chinese tea with respect to the Japanese tea was also high.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available