4.5 Review

Emerging methodologies for pathogen identification in bloodstream infections: an update

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 161-173

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2019.1568241

Keywords

Bacteremia; diagnosis; MALDI-TOF MS; PCR; metagenomics

Categories

Funding

  1. Region Provence Alpes Cote d'Azur
  2. Fonds Europeen de Developpement Regional Plateformes de Recherche et d'Innovation Mutualisees Mediterranee Infection (FEDER PRIMI)
  3. [10-IAHU-03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) remain a major public health burden worldwide, particularly in high-income countries as they are associated with a significant mortality rate. As early administration of appropriate antimicrobial therapy is a major prognostic factor, there remain unmet needs for shortening BSI diagnosis. Current blood cultures (BC) processing to identify pathogens involved in BSI is not compatible with such delays, although it remains the gold standard. Areas covered: Herein, we review and discuss emerging or ongoing assessed methodologies dedicated to shorten the identification of microorganisms involved in BSI and published since 2015. A particular focus on the economical and clinical impact of these approaches is provided when hindsight is sufficient. Methods to shorten antibiotic susceptibility testing are also reviewed. Expert commentary: Post-culture approaches have encountered a huge success as they are reliable, fast and easy to implement in the laboratory. In particular, the MALDI-TOF MS was shown to be a cost-effective method when combined with antimicrobial stewardship policies. However, further research is needed to optimize methods performed on whole blood in particular next-generation sequencing methods, as they represent an opportunity to substantially improve management of high-risk patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available