4.5 Review

Monkeypox re-emergence in Africa: a call to expand the concept and practice of One Health

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 129-139

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2019.1567330

Keywords

Monkeypox; One Health; zoonosis; orthopoxvirus

Funding

  1. NCEZID CDC HHS [U01 CK000539, U01 CK000359] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Intramural CDC HHS [CC999999] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: Monkeypox is a re-emerging viral zoonosis that occurs naturally in heavily forested regions of West and Central Africa. Inter-human transmission of monkeypox virus, although limited, drives outbreaks, particularly in household and health-care settings. But the available evidence suggests that without repeated zoonotic introductions, human infections would eventually cease to occur. Therefore, interrupting virus transmission from animals to humans is key to combating this disease. Areas covered: Herein we review laboratory and field studies examining the susceptibility of various animal taxa to monkeypox virus infection, and note the competence of various species to serve as reservoirs or transmission hosts. In addition, we discuss early socio-ecologic theories of monkeypox virus transmission in rural settings and review current modes of ecologic investigation - including ecologic niche modeling, and ecologic sampling - in light of their potential to identify specific animal species and features of the environment that are associated with heightened risk for human disease. Expert opinion: The role of disease ecology and scientific research in ongoing disease prevention efforts should be reinforced, particularly for wildlife-associated zoonoses such as monkeypox. Such efforts alongside those aimed at nurturing 'One Health' collaborations may ultimately hold the greatest promise for reducing human infections with this pathogen.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available