4.2 Article

Development of innate immune cells from human pluripotent stem cells

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY
Volume 71, Issue -, Pages 13-23

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2018.12.005

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute [R01 CA203348, U01 CA217885]
  2. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine [CIRM DISC2-09615, CIRM TRAN1-10587]
  3. Takeda-Sanford Innovation Alliance
  4. Fate Therapeutics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mouse and human pluripotent stem cells have been widely used to study the development of the hematopoietic and immune systems. Although not all cells can be derived with the same efficiency, immune cells such as natural killer (NK) cells and macrophages can be easily produced from PSCs to enable development of new cell-based therapies. NK cells and macrophages are part of the innate immune system, the first line of defense against malignancies and infectious disease. Human embryonic stem cell (hESC)- and induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived NK cells can be produced at a clinical scale suitable for translation into clinical trials. Additionally, PSCs can be genetically modified to produce hESC/iPSC-derived human NK cells with enhanced antitumor activity. These engineered NK cells can express a stabilized version of the high-affinity Fc receptor CD16, chimeric antigen receptors, or other strategies to enable more potent and targeted cellular immunotherapies. Moreover, macrophages can also be routinely and efficiently produced from hESCs and iPSCs as a tool to expand our knowledge of the basic biology of these cells. hESC- and iPSC-derived macrophages can also be employed as a novel approach for cancer immunotherapy, as well as a strategy to repair or regenerate diseased and damaged tissues and organs. (C) 2019 ISEH - Society for Hematology and Stem Cells. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available