4.6 Article

Ageing attenuates muscarinic-mediated sweating differently in men and women with no effect on nicotinic-mediated sweating

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 8, Pages 968-971

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/exd.13878

Keywords

acetylcholine; axon reflex; heat loss; sex hormones; thermoregulation

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Funding Source: Medline
  2. University of Ottawa Research Chair Award Funding Source: Medline
  3. Human and Environmental Physiology Research Unit Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ageing attenuates muscarinic-mediated sweating. However, whether ageing also impairs nicotinic-mediated sweating remains unclear. Further, despite the known sex-related differences in peripheral sweat gland function, it remains unclear whether age-related modifications of muscarinic and nicotinic-mediated sweating, if any, are similar between men and women. We assessed local sweating in young and older healthy men and women (n = 11, each group) at two dorsal forearm skin sites receiving either: (a) methacholine (muscarinic receptor agonist, 5 doses: 0.0125, 0.25, 5, 100, 2000 mmol/L) or (b) nicotine (nicotinic receptor agonist, 5 doses: 1.2, 3.6, 11, 33, 100 mmol/L) via intradermal microdialysis. Age-related reductions in methacholine-induced sweating were observed at low-to-moderate doses (0.0125-5 mmol/L; all P <= 0.05) in men, whereas a reduction was only evident at the highest methacholine dose (2000 mmol/L; P <= 0.05) in women. No effect of ageing was observed for nicotine-induced sweating (all P > 0.26 for main effects of age, dose and all interactions). We showed that while healthy ageing attenuates low-to-moderate levels of muscarinic-mediated sweating in men, reductions are only observed at high levels of muscarinic-mediated sweating in women. However, healthy ageing does not modulate nicotinic-mediated sweating in either men or women.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available