4.5 Article

Revision adult spinal deformity surgery: Does the number of previous operations have a negative impact on outcome?

Journal

EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 155-160

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5747-1

Keywords

Adult spinal deformity; Revision surgery; Outcome

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeTo study the effect of the number of previous operations on the outcome of revision adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery.MethodsOne hundred and thirty-seven consecutive patients who underwent revision ASD surgery were classified as follows: those who had one previous operation (group 1), had two previous operations (group 2) and had three or more previous operations (group 3). Perioperative complications and additional surgeries were reviewed. Back pain, leg pain, ODI scores and radiographic measurements were obtained.ResultsPreoperatively, the patients in group 3 had worse ODI (60.0 vs. 48.1 and 47.9, p<0.01) but not back pain or leg pain. Group 2 and group 3 had worse coronal plumb line (38.4 and 35.8mm vs. 18.2mm, p<0.05) and SVA (99.7 and 153.9mm vs. 67.8mm, p<0.05). Group 3 had worse PI-LL mismatch (40.1 degrees vs. 25.3 degrees and 26.2 degrees, p=0.08). Minor and major perioperative complication rates were 27.5% in group 1, 31.1% in group 2 and 39.0% in group 3 (p>0.05). At mean 30-month follow-up, the additional surgery rates were 7.8, 17.8 and 22.0%, respectively (p=0.07). The patients in all groups had improved back pain, leg pain and ODI scores. The net improvements on back pain, leg pain and ODI were not statistically different between the groups.ConclusionsRevision ASD patients who had two or more previous operations present with more coronal and sagittal imbalance and worse functional status. Patients who had three or more previous operations have relatively higher reoperation rate but similar perioperative complication rate and similar clinic improvements. [GRAPHICS] .

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available