4.6 Article

Telomere length and genetic variant associations with interstitial lung disease progression and survival

Journal

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
Volume 53, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01641-2018

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 HL09309, KL2TR001103, K23HL13890, KL2TR001870, R01 HL130796]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Leukocyte telomere length (LTL), MUC5B rs35705950 and TOLLIP rs5743890 have been associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). In this observational cohort study, we assessed the associations between these genomic markers and outcomes of survival and rate of disease progression in patients with interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF, n=250) and connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD, n=248). IPF (n=499) was used as a comparator. The LTL of IPAF and CTD-ILD patients (mean age-adjusted log-transformed T/S of -0.05 +/- 0.29 and -0.04 +/- 0.25, respectively) is longer than that of IPF patients (-0.17 +/- 0.32). For IPAF patients, LTL <10th percentile is associated with faster lung function decline compared to LTL. 10th percentile (-6.43% per year versus -0.86% per year; p<0.0001) and worse transplant-free survival (hazard ratio 2.97, 95% CI 1.70-5.20; p=0.00014). The MUC5B rs35705950 minor allele frequency (MAF) is greater for IPAF patients (23.2, 95% CI 18.8-28.2; p<0.0001) than controls and is associated with worse transplant-free IPAF survival (hazard ratio 1.92, 95% CI 1.18-3.13; p=0.0091). Rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-associated ILD (RA-ILD) has a shorter LTL than non-RA CTD-ILD (-0.14 +/- 0.27 versus -0.01 +/- 0.23; p=0.00055) and higher MUC5B MAF (34.6, 95% CI 24.4-46.3 versus 14.1, 95% CI 9.8-20.0; p=0.00025). Neither LTL nor MUC5B are associated with transplant-free CTD-ILD survival. LTL and MUC5B MAF have different associations with lung function progression and survival for IPAF and CTD-ILD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available