4.7 Article

Accuracy of iodine density thresholds for the separation of vertebral bone metastases from healthy-appearing trabecular bone in spectral detector computed tomography

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages 3253-3261

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5843-y

Keywords

Bone; Tomography; Iodine; Diagnosis; Neoplasm metastasis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeTo evaluate quantitative iodine density mapping (IDM) with spectral detector computed tomography (SDCT) as a quantitative biomarker for separation of vertebral trabecular bone metastases (BM) from healthy-appearing trabecular bone (HTB).Materials and methodsIRB-approved retrospective single-center-study of portal venous SDCT datasets acquired between June 2016 and March 2017. Inclusion of 43 consecutive cancer patients with BM and 40 without. Target lesions and non-affected control vertebrae were defined using follow-up imaging, MRI, and/or bone scintigraphy. ID and standard deviation were determined with ROI measures by two readers in (a) bone metastases, (b) HTB of BM patients and controls, and (c) ID of various vessels. Volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) of the lumbar spine and age were recorded. Multivariate ROC analyses und Wilcoxon test were used to determine thresholds for separation of BM and HTB. p<0.05 was considered significant.ResultsID measurements of 40 target lesions and 83 reference measurements of HTB were acquired. Age (p<0.0001) and vBMD (p<0.05) affected ID measurements independently in multivariate models. There were significant differences of ID between metastases (n=43) and HTB ID (n=124; mean 5.50.9 vs. 3.50.9; p<0.0001), however, with considerable overlap. In univariate analysis, increased ID discriminated bone lesions (AUC 0.90) with a maximum combined specificity/sensitivity of 77.5%/90.7% when applying a threshold of 4.5mg/ml. Multivariate regression models improved significantly when considering vBMD, the noise of ID, and vertebral venous ID (AUC 0.98).ConclusionIDM of SDCT yielded a statistical separation of vertebral bone lesions and HTB. Adjustment for confounders such as age and lumbar vBMD as well as for vertebral venous ID and lesion heterogeneity improved discrimination of trabecular lesions.Key Points center dot SDCT iodine density mapping provides the possibility for quantitative analysis of iodine uptake in tissue, which allows to differentiate bone lesions from healthy bone marrow. Age and vBMD have a significant impact on iodine density measurements. Iodine density measured in SDCT yielded highest sensitivity and specificity for the statistical differentiation of vertebral trabecular metastases and healthy trabecular bone using an iodine density threshold of 4.5mg/ml (most performant)-5.0mg/ml (optimized for specificity).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available