4.7 Article

Forensic age estimation for pelvic X-ray images using deep learning

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 5, Pages 2322-2329

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5791-6

Keywords

Age determination by skeleton; Forensic anthropology; Pelvis; Radiography; Machine learning

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeTo develop a deep learning bone age assessment model based on pelvic radiographs for forensic age estimation and compare its performance to that of the existing cubic regression model.Materials and methodA retrospective collection data of 1875 clinical pelvic radiographs between 10 and 25years of age was obtained to develop the model. Model performance was assessed by comparing the testing results to estimated ages calculated directly using the existing cubic regression model based on ossification staging methods. The mean absolute error (MAE) and root-mean-squared error (RMSE) between the estimated ages and chronological age were calculated for both models.ResultsFor all test samples (between 10 and 25years old), the mean MAE and RMSE between the automatic estimates using the proposed deep learning model and the reference standard were 0.94 and 1.30years, respectively. For the test samples comparable to those of the existing cubic regression model (between 14 and 22years old), the mean MAE and RMSE for the deep learning model were 0.89 and 1.21years, respectively. For the existing cubic regression model, the mean MAE and RMSE were 1.05 and 1.61years, respectively.ConclusionThe deep learning convolutional neural network model achieves performance on par with the existing cubic regression model, demonstrating predictive ability capable of automated skeletal bone assessment based on pelvic radiographic images.Key Points center dot The pelvis has considerable value in determining the bone age.center dot Deep learning can be used to create an automated bone age assessment model based on pelvic radiographs.center dot The deep learning convolutional neural network model achieves performance on par with the existing cubic regression model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available