4.7 Article

IceCube bounds on sterile neutrinos above 10 eV

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
Volume 78, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6282-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant [674896-Elusives, 690575-InvisiblesPlus]
  2. Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigacion (AEI)
  3. EU Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER) [FPA2016-78645-P]
  4. Spanish MINECO through the Ramon y Cajal programme
  5. Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa Program [SEV-2012-0249]
  6. Goran Gustafsson foundation
  7. MINECO [FPA2016-76005-C2-1-P]
  8. ICCUB [MDM-2014-0367]
  9. [2017-SGR-929]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study the capabilities of IceCube to search for sterile neutrinos with masses above 10 eV by analyzing its nu(mu) disappearance atmospheric neutrino sample. We find that IceCube is not only sensitive to the mixing of sterile neutrinos to muon neutrinos, but also to the more elusive mixing with tau neutrinos through matter effects. The currently released 1-year data shows a mild preference, between 0.75 and 3 sigma depending on the binning and flux adopted, for non-zero sterile mixing. This hint overlaps with the favored region for the sterile neutrino interpretation of the ANITA upward shower although the null results from CHORUS and NOMAD on nu(mu) to nu(tau) oscillations in vacuum exclude this interpretation, while through a different channel and using a different energy range. At the 99% C.L. an upper bound is obtained that improves over the present Super-Kamiokande and DeepCore constraints in some parts of the parameter space. We also investigate the physics reach of the roughly 8 years of data that is already on tape as well as a forecast of 20 years data to probe the present hint or improve upon current constraints.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available