4.3 Article

The competition between Lorentz and Coriolis forces in planetary dynamos

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s40645-015-0054-5

Keywords

Planetary dynamos; Core convection; Magnetic fields; Rotation; Magnetostrophic force balance

Funding

  1. Japanese Geophysical Union
  2. National Science Foundation
  3. National Science Foundation [AST-0909206]
  4. National Science Foundation Geophysics Program [EAR-1246861]
  5. NASA High-End Computing (HEC) Program through the NASA Advanced Supercomputing (NAS) Division at Ames Research Center
  6. Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (CSCS) [s225]
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  8. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [0909206] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fluid motions within planetary cores generate magnetic fields through dynamo action. These core processes are driven by thermo-compositional convection subject to the competing influences of rotation, which tends to organize the flow into axial columns, and the Lorentz force, which tends to inhibit the relative movement of the magnetic field and the fluid. It is often argued that these forces are predominant and approximately equal in planetary cores; we test this hypothesis using a suite of numerical geodynamo models to calculate the Lorentz to Coriolis force ratio directly. Our results show that this ratio can be estimated by Lambda(d)* similar or equal to Lambda(i)Rm(-1/2) (Lambda(i) is the traditionally defined Elsasser number for imposed magnetic fields and Rm is the system-scale ratio of magnetic induction to magnetic diffusion). Best estimates of core flow speeds and magnetic field strengths predict the geodynamo to be in magnetostrophic balance where the Lorentz and Coriolis forces are comparable. The Lorentz force may also be significant, i.e., within an order of magnitude of the Coriolis force, in the Jovian interior. In contrast, the Lorentz force is likely to be relatively weak in the cores of Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Ganymede, and Mercury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available