4.6 Article

Association between the metabolically healthy obese phenotype and the risk of myocardial infarction: results from the Kailuan study

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 179, Issue 6, Pages 343-352

Publisher

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-18-0356

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Program of Natural Science Fund of China [81530087, 81673247, 81872708]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: This study aimed to determine if the metabolically healthy obese (MHO) is associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) in Chinese population. Design: The Kailuan study is a community-based prospective cohort study. Methods: BMI and metabolic syndrome (MetS) were assessed in 91 866 participants without a history of MI or stroke. Participants were categorised into six mutually exclusive groups according to the BMI-MetS status: normal weight (BMI: <= 18.5to <24.0 kg/m(2)) without MetS (MH-NW), normal weight with MetS (MUH-NW), overweight (BMI: <= 24.0to <28.0 kg/m(2)) without MetS (MH-OW), overweight with MetS (MUH-OW), obese (BMI >= 28.0 kg/m(2) ) without MetS (MHO) and obese with MetS (MUO). The hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI was calculated for the incidence of MI using a multivariable Cox model. Results: A total of 6745 (7.34%) individuals were classified as MHO. During a median 8-year follow-up, 1167 (1.27%) participants developed MI. The MHO group had an increased risk of MI (HR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.37-2.25) in comparison with the MH-NW group after adjusting for potential confounding variables. After a similar adjustment, the risk of MI was significantly elevated in the MUH-NW (HR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.28-2.05), MUH-OW (HR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.67-2.35) and MUO group (HR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.70-2.49). Conclusions: MHO subjects showed a substantially higher risk of MI in comparison with MH-NW subjects. That said, even without measurable metabolic abnormalities, obesity was associated with a higher risk of MI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available