4.6 Article

Long-term treatment with pegvisomant: observations from 2090 acromegaly patients in ACROSTUDY

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 179, Issue 6, Pages 419-427

Publisher

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-18-0616

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Pfizer Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: ACROSTUDY is an international, non-interventional study of acromegaly patients treated with pegvisomant (PEGV), a growth hormone receptor antagonist and has been conducted since 2004 in 15 countries to study the long-term safety and efficacy of PEGV. This report comprises the second interim analysis of 2090 patients as of May 12, 2016. Methods: Descriptive analyses of safety, pituitary imaging and outcomes on PEGV treatment up to 12 years were performed. Results: Prior to starting PEGV, 96% of patients had reported surgery, radiation, medical therapy or any combinations of those. At start of PEGV, 89% of patients had IGFI levels above the upper limit of normal (ULN). The percentage of patients with normal IGFI levels increased from 53% at year 1 to 73% at year 10, and the average daily dose of PEGV increased from 12.8 mg (year 1) to 18.9 mg (year 10). A total of 4832 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 1137 patients (54.4%), of which 570 were considered treatment related in 337 patients (16.1%). Serious AEs were reported in 22% of patients, of which 2.3% were considered treatment related. Locally reported MR's showed most patients (72.2%) had no change in tumor size relative to the prior scan; 16.8% had a decrease, 6.8% an increase and 4.3% both. In patients with normal liver tests at PEGV start, an ALT or AST elevation of >3x ULN at any time point during their fol low-up was reported in 3%. Conclusions: This second interim analysis confirms that long-term use of PEGV is an effective and safe treatment in patients with acromegaly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available