4.3 Article

Drug incompatibilities in intravenous therapy: evaluation and proposition of preventive tools in intensive care and hematology units

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 75, Issue 2, Pages 179-187

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-018-2602-6

Keywords

Drug incompatibilities; Intravenous therapy; Adverse drug events prevention; Pharmacist; Intensive care unit

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposePhysicochemical incompatibility (PCI) between drugs infused together is frequent, but under-recognized. PCI can lead to drug inactivity, catheter occlusion, embolism or inflammatory reactions. The aims of this work were to identify most frequent and relevant drug incompatibilities and to review and develop strategies for their prevention.MethodThis was an observational prospective survey conducted between January and March 2015 in an intensive care unit (ICU) and in September 2014 in a hematology sterile unit (HSU). Drugs administered to patients were recorded and their compatibility assessed based on published compatibility data.ResultsDrug incompatibilities accounted for 12% (23/189) and 17% (116/686) of drug pairs infused in the ICU and the HSU, respectively. Pantoprazole was the most frequent drug implied in PCI. Regarding drug classes, anti-infective agents and gastrointestinal drugs were the most frequently implied. Among the incompatible pairs, 78% and 61% implicated a drug with extreme pH in the ICU and HSU, respectively. The tools proposed to reduce the frequency of PCI included: compatibility cross-tables, labeling of drugs with extreme pH and optimized administration schedules.ConclusionsGiven the frequency and the potential for severe consequences of PCI, pharmacists have a role to play in raising awareness of nurses and practitioners, and proposing adequate tools and solutions to reduce their incidence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available