4.4 Article

Contribution of systemic vascular reactivity to variability in pulse volume amplitude response during reactive hyperemia

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 119, Issue 3, Pages 753-760

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-018-04066-6

Keywords

Photoplethysmography; Reactive hyperemia; Sympathetic activity; Inter-subject variability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposeThe aim of the present study was to investigate why the magnitude of reactive hyperemia (RH) observed by pulse volume amplitude (PVA) after arm occlusion differs greatly among study subjects.MethodsHealthy subjects (n=12) in the age range of 22-30years participated in this study. Vascular reactivity was assessed by measuring the changes in finger PVA simultaneously in the test (occluded arm) and control arm (contralateral non-occluded arm) using two separate Photoplethysmographic sensors. Short-term HRV was computed from simultaneously acquired lead II ECG signal to monitor the changes in cardiac sympathetic nervous activity.ResultsThe observed coefficient of variation for inter-subject variability in PVA response in test arm during second minute of RH was 115.3%. In the control arm, significantly reduced PVA was observed during the period of occlusion as well as RH. This observation was corroborated by simultaneously acquired short-term HRV which showed a significant rise in total power (p value<0.005) and low-frequency (LF) power (p value<0.05) during release of occlusion when compared to the baseline. A significant positive correlation (Spearman r=0.33; p=0.02) was observed between % change in PVA in the control arm and in the test arm for first 3min of RH.ConclusionsSympathetic activation possibly plays an important role in mediating the inter-subject variability of vascular responses during reactive hyperemia which warrants simultaneous recording of both the test and the control arm responses during RH to accurately assess endothelial function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available