4.5 Article

Gonadosomatic index as a confounding variable in fish-based screening assays for the detection of anti-estrogens and nonaromatizable androgens

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages 603-615

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/etc.4353

Keywords

Endocrine disruption; Anti-estrogen; Androgen; Gonadosomatic index; Screening assay

Funding

  1. TCU Research and Creative Activities Fund
  2. TCU Biology Department Adkins Fund
  3. TCU College of Science and Engineering Graduate Student Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The presence of reproductive endocrine-disrupting compounds (REDCs) in the environment poses a potential threat to fish and wildlife, because exposures are capable of altering sexual development, reproductive success, and behavior. Fish-based screening assays are often utilized to screen for the presence of REDCs in surface waters and to assess single chemicals for potential endocrine-disrupting activity. In an effort to improve such screening assays, the goal of the present study was to determine whether the gonadosomatic index (GSI) of female fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas), as assessed via external characteristics, influences their response to REDC exposure. Specifically, we sought to determine whether low-GSI females differed from high-GSI females in their responses to the model anti-estrogen fadrozole and the model androgen 17 beta-trenbolone, and whether there was a preferable classification in the context of REDC screening. Low-GSI females were more sensitive to fadrozole at the lower concentration of fadrozole (5 mu g/L) and to the higher concentration of trenbolone (50 ng/L), whereas high-GSI females were more sensitive at the lower concentration of trenbolone (5 ng/L). The differential response of low- and high-GSI females to REDCs indicates that GSI influences exposure outcome, and should subsequently be taken into consideration in the implementation of screening assays, as failure to utilize fish of the appropriate reproductive status may skew the test results. Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;38:603-615. (c) 2019 SETAC

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available