4.7 Article

Raman microspectroscopic identification of microplastic particles in freshwater bivalves (Unio pictorum) exposed to sewage treatment plant effluents under different exposure scenarios

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages 2007-2012

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3609-3

Keywords

Microplastic (MP); Aquatic environment; Raman microspectroscopy (RM); Freshwater bivalve; Sewage treatment plant (STP)

Funding

  1. Bavarian State Ministry of the Environment and Consumer Protection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the uptake of microplastic (MP, <5mm) particles by using freshwater bivalves (Unio pictorum) as biological samplers in the environment. They were exposed either directly to the biologically purified sewage of a North Bavarian sewage treatment plant (STP) or placed in a small river up- and downstream of the wastewater discharge for 28days and 6months, respectively. A control group was maintained in a pond. After acid digestion, the soft tissue was analyzed for MP particles by means of Raman microspectroscopy (RM, over 3000 particles individually measured), which allows for identification and quantification of particles down to 1m. Only in the bivalve collective exposed to STP effluents MP was found, however a very small amount (maximum of nine MP particles in the bivalve sample exposed for 6months). In the bivalves up- and downstream of the wastewater discharge and in control organisms from a pond, no microplastic was identified. The amount of microplastic particles was small in absolute terms and small in relative terms (ca. 1:100 (6 months) and below 1:1000 (28 days)) as hundreds of particles per sample were analyzed which turned out to be non-plastic. Including the results for the river, this indicates a rather low MP contamination level for organisms in close vicinity to a sewage treatment plant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available