4.7 Article

Using magnetic susceptibility to evaluate pollution status of the sediment for a typical reservoir in northwestern China

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 3019-3032

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3844-7

Keywords

Trace metal; Natural radionuclide; Pollution indicator; Source discrimination; Environmental magnetism method

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41271510]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University [GK201601009, 2017TS027]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intensive anthropogenic activities may add to pollution risks to lakes and rivers, which can be revealed by the magnetic characteristics of sediments. The present study aims to assess the pollution status of the sediment of a typical reservoir in northwestern China by application of magnetic susceptibility. The values of magnetic susceptibility exhibited significant positive correlations with trace metals (Co, Cu, Mn, Ni, and V) and natural radionuclides (Th-232 and K-40). Multivariate statistical analysis indicated common sources and similar deposition characteristics of magnetic particles and trace metals. It was conformed that magnetic susceptibility could be used as an indicator to identify industrial sources of trace metals, but was not suitable to indicate the traffic or natural sources. Linear regression equations between the low-frequency magnetic susceptibility and the integrated pollution index as well as annual effective dose rate indicated a potential for using magnetic susceptibility in semi-quantitative assessment of trace metal pollution and radiological hazard in sediments. A three-step procedure is proposed for the use of magnetic susceptibility in pollution monitoring, which provides a fast and effective method for estimating the pollution extent and tracing the major sources of trace metals in the sediment of lakes and rivers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available