4.7 Article

Abiotic reduction of Cr(VI) by humic acids derived from peat and lignite: kinetics and removal mechanism

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages 4717-4729

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3902-1

Keywords

Humic substances; Humic acids; Chromium; Contaminated land; Groundwater

Funding

  1. Mutah University/Jordan
  2. UK Natural Environment Research Council [NE/L01405X/1, SP12696, SP15711]
  3. NERC [NE/L01405X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/L01405X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hexavalent chromium contamination of groundwater is a worldwide problem caused by anthropogenic and natural processes. We report the rate of Cr(VI) removal by two humic acids (extracted from Miocene age lignite and younger peat soil) in aqueous suspensions across a pH range likely to be encountered in terrestrial environments. Cr(VI) was reduced to Cr(III) in a first-order reaction with respect Cr(VI) concentration, but exhibited a partial order (similar to 0.5) with respect to [H+]. This reaction was more rapid with the peat humic acid, where Cr(VI) reduction was observed at all pH values investigated (3.7 a 10.5). C-13 NMR and pyrolysis GC-MS spectroscopy indicate that the reaction results in loss of substituted phenolic moieties and hydroxyl groups from the humic acids. X-ray absorption spectroscopy indicated that at all pH values the resulting Cr(III) was associated with the partially degraded humic acid in an inner-sphere adsorption complex. The reaction mechanism is likely to be controlled by ester formation between Cr(VI) and phenolic/hydroxyl moieties, as this initial step is rapid in acidic systems but far less favourable in alkaline conditions. Our findings highlight the potential of humic acid to reduce and remove Cr(VI) from solution in a range of environmental conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available