4.8 Article

Exploring Future Food Provision Scenarios for China

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 53, Issue 3, Pages 1385-1393

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b04375

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0800106]
  2. Chinese National Basic Research Program [2015CB150405]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31572210]
  4. Hundred Talent Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
  5. Distinguished Young Scientists Project of Natural Science Foundation of Hebei [D2017503023]
  6. President's International Fellowship Initiative, PIFI of the Chinese Academy of Science [2016DE008, 2016VBA073]
  7. Hebei Dairy Cattle Innovation Team of Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System, China [HBCT2018120206]
  8. FACCE-JPI Surplus
  9. BBSRC [BBS/E/C/000I0310, BB/N013468/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Developing sustainable food systems is essential, especially for emerging economies, where food systems are changing rapidly and affect the environment and natural resources. We explored possible future pathways for a sustainable food system in China, using multiple environmental indicators linked to eight of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Forecasts for 2030 in a business as usual scenario (BAU) indicate increases in animal food consumption as well as increased shortages of the land available and the water needed to produce the required food in China. Associated greenhouse gas emissions and nitrogen and phosphorus losses could become 10-42% of global emissions in 2010. We developed three main pathways besides BAU [produce more and better food (PMB), consume and waste less food (CWL), and import. more food (IMF)]. and analyzed their impacts and contributions to achieving one or more of the eight SDGs. Under these scenarios, the demand for land and water and the emissions of GHG and nutrients may decrease by 7-55% compared to BAU, depending on the pathway followed. A combination of PMB and CWL was most effective, while IMF externalizes impacts to countries exporting to China. Modestly increasing feed or food imports in a selective manner could ease the pressure on natural resources. Our modeling framework allows us to analyze the effects of changes in food production consumption systems in an integrated manner, and the results can be linked to the eight SDGs. Despite formidable technological, social, educational, and structural barriers that need to be overcome, our study indicates that the ambitious targets of China's new agricultural and environmental strategy appear to be achievable.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available