4.8 Article

Heavy Metal Exposure Alters the Uptake Behavior of 16 Priority Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) by Pak Choi (Brassica chinensis L.)

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 22, Pages 13457-13468

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b01405

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Huazhong University of Science and Technology
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2016YXMS285]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31370421]
  4. Hubei Foundation [2016ACA162]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and heavy metals (HMs) are predominant pollutants normally coexisting at electronic waste dumping sites or in agricultural soils irrigated with wastewater. The accumulation of PAHs and HMs in food crops has become a major concern for food security. This study explored the hydroponic uptake of 16 priority PAHs and 5 HMs (Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, and Zn) by pak choi (Brassica chinensis L.). PAHs exhibited stronger inhibition on pak choi growth and physiological features than HMs. Five HMs were categorized into high-impact HMs (Cr, Cu, and Pb) and low-impact HMs (Cd and Zn) with distinct behavior under the coexposure with PAHs, and low-impact HMs showed synergistic toxicity effects with PAHs. Coexposure to PAHs and HMs slightly decreased the uptake and translocation of PAHs by pak choi, possibly attributing to the commutative hindering effects on root adsorption or cation-pi interactions. The bioconcentration factors in PAHs + HMs treatments were independent of the octanol-water partition coefficient (K-ow), owing to the cation-pi interaction associated change of K-ow and induced defective root system. This study provides new insights into the mechanisms and influential factors of PAHs uptake in Brassica chinensis L. and gives clues for reassessing the environmental risks of PAHs in food crops.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available