4.7 Article

Responses of forest ecosystems in Europe to decreasing nitrogen deposition

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 244, Issue -, Pages 980-994

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.101

Keywords

Nitrogen deposition; Forest monitoring; Emission reduction; Recovery; Air pollution

Funding

  1. project ACRP7 -WOOD-N-CLIMATE, Austria [KR14AC7K11858]
  2. European Research Council Synergy grant [ERC-SyG-2013-610028 IMBALANCE-P]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Average nitrogen (N) deposition across Europe has declined since the 1990s. This resulted in decreased N inputs to forest ecosystems especially in Central and Western Europe where deposition levels are highest. While the impact of atmospheric N deposition on forests has been receiving much attention for decades, ecosystem responses to the decline in N inputs received less attention. Here, we review observational studies reporting on trends in a number of indicators: soil acidification and eutrophication, understory vegetation, tree nutrition (foliar element concentrations) as well as tree vitality and growth in response to decreasing N deposition across Europe. Ecosystem responses varied with limited decrease in soil solution nitrate concentrations and potentially also foliar N concentrations. There was no large-scale response in understory vegetation, tree growth, or vitality. Experimental studies support the observation of a more distinct reaction of soil solution and foliar element concentrations to changes in N supply compared to the three other parameters. According to the most likely scenarios, further decrease of N deposition will be limited. We hypothesize that this expected decline will not cause major responses of the parameters analysed in this study. Instead, future changes might be more strongly controlled by the development of N pools accumulated within forest soils, affected by climate change and forest management. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available