4.7 Article

Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species as key indicators of plant responses to Cd stress

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY
Volume 161, Issue -, Pages 107-119

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.10.012

Keywords

Cadmium; H2O2; Nitric oxide; Reactive oxygen species; Reactive nitrogen species; Signalling

Funding

  1. European Regional Development Fund [BIO2015-67657-P]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness [BIO2015-67657-P]
  3. Junta de Andalucia [BIO-337]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports
  5. Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although cadmium (Cd), an extremely toxic non-essential heavy metal, has no biological function, it is capable of entering plant roots. Cd not only presents a problem for plants, which have developed specific Cd detection, transport and detoxification mechanisms, but also for humans as it can enter the food chain. After entering the root, Cd can be loaded into the xylem and then into the leaves and fruits, thus constituting a major environmental and health hazard worldwide. Understanding the mechanisms involved in plant responses to Cd stress would facilitate the production of crops with a lower Cd uptake and accumulation capacity as well as plants with greater Cd uptake potential for phytoremediation. One of the most common symptoms of Cd toxicity is the induction of oxidative stress in plants, which have developed various strategies to avoid this toxicity, including the early production of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS and RNS) with signalling functions. This review focuses on the dual role of ROS and RNS in plant responses to Cd stress: in low concentrations, as signalling molecules capable of orchestrating plant responses on the one hand, and at higher concentrations, as oxidative stress inducers on the other.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available