4.8 Article

Indoor ozone levels, houseplants and peak expiratory flow rates among healthy adults in Taipei, Taiwan

Journal

ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL
Volume 122, Issue -, Pages 231-236

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.11.010

Keywords

Houseplant; Indoor air; Ozone; Isoprene; Peak expiratory flow rate

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 104-2621-M-038-001-MY2, MOST 106-2314-B-038-048]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The association between houseplants and indoor air quality improvement has been reported in previous studies. However, the effect of houseplant-emitted isoprene on the association between ozone (O-3) formation and respiratory health remains unclear. We recruited 60 adult subjects from 60 houses with or without houseplants (1:1) in Taipei; twelve house visits were conducted in each home throughout 2014. The indoor air pollutants that were measured consisted of particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 mu m in diameter (PM2.5), O-3 and isoprene. Peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) was measured in each study subject during each house visit. Household information was collected by a questionnaire. Mixed-effects models were used to explore the association between indoor air pollution levels and PEFR. We found that the concentrations of O-3 and isoprene in houses with houseplants were higher than those in houses without houseplants. In contrast, PM2.5 levels and % predicted PEFR were higher in houses without houseplants than in those with houseplants. Moreover, increased levels of O-3 and PM2.5 in houses with houseplants were associated with a decreased % predicted PEFR, especially in the summer. We concluded that increased levels of indoor O-3 and PM2.5 were associated with decreased PEFR. The presence of houseplants was associated with indoor O-3, isoprene and PEFR variations in the summer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available