4.7 Article

Overbreak prediction and optimization in tunnel using neural network and bee colony techniques

Journal

ENGINEERING WITH COMPUTERS
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 1191-1202

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00366-018-0658-7

Keywords

Tunneling; Overbreak; Artificial neural network; Artificial bee colony; Optimization algorithms

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Overbreak is an undesirable phenomenon in blasting operations. The causing factors of overbreak can be generally divided as blasting and geological parameters. Due to multiplicity of effective parameters and complexity of interactions among these parameters, empirical methods may not be fully appropriated for blasting pattern design. In this research, artificial neural network (ANN) as a powerful tool for solving such complicated problems is developed to predict overbreak induced by blasting operations in the Gardaneh Rokh tunnel, Iran. To develop an ANN model, an established database comprising of 255 datasets has been utilized. A three-layer ANN was found as an optimum model for prediction of overbreak. The coefficient of determination (R-2) and root mean square error (RMSE) values of the selected model were obtained as 0.921, 0.4820, 0.923 and 0.4277 for training and testing, respectively, which demonstrate a high capability of ANN in predicting overbreak. After selecting the best model, the selected model was used for optimization purpose using artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm as one of the most powerful optimization algorithms. Considering this point that overbreak is one of the main problems in tunneling, reducing its amount causes to have a good tunneling operation. After making several models of optimization and variations in its weights, the optimum amount for the extra drilling was 1.63 m(2), which is 47% lower than the lowest value (3.055 m(2)). It can be concluded that ABC algorithm can be introduced as a new optimizing algorithm to minimize overbreak induced by tunneling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available